Against Empathy - The Case for Rational Compassion
Paul Bloom
Summary
In a world often dominated by emotional appeals and instinctive reactions, the argument for a more measured, rational form of compassion offers a compelling alternative to traditional empathy. This perspective challenges the widely held belief that empathy is an unequivocal virtue, proposing instead that a critical reevaluation is necessary to promote ethical and effective human interaction. The discussion pivots around the distinction between empathy as an emotional response and compassion as a deliberate, reasoned choice to care for others.
- Empathy is inherently biased: It tends to favor those closer to us or those who evoke...
Full summary available for members.
Log in or create a free account to view.